Personal tools
You are here: Home Blog 2010 March 02 Does Compensation Skew Advice?

Does Compensation Skew Advice?

by Mark Little — last modified Mar 02, 2010 11:55 AM

Is your business prepared if the U.S. Government were to begin actively regulating from that perspective?

 

A Dow Jones article, just released through Financial Advisor Magazine, stating that Proposed Reforms Stir Debate, is yet another "wake up call" for financial advisors to ensure they are providing value and advice to their clients in such a way that they always operate in the clients' best interests.

joe_biden

According to the March 2nd Dow Jones article,

  • "If the U.S. Labor Department has its way, the rules governing who can give Americans investment advice about their (retirement accounts), and how that advice gets delivered and paid for, soon will change."
  • "The Obama administration's aim is to eliminate the problem of advisors with hidden conflicts of interest giving slanted advice to unsuspecting retirement savers."
  • "If investment advisors get a commission or other compensation for steering workers into investment options with high fees and expenses, they face conflicts of interest that can undermine the reliability of their advice."

 

Financial advisors who are focused upon offering conflict-free comprehensive financial services have nothing to fear. The Trusted Advisor Toolkit™ is focused upon supporting financial advisors who are seeking to deliver even more comprehensive financial services to their Ideal Clients through a Best-in-Class Deliverables Team of Subject Matter Experts.  These financial advisors who have fully committed to comprehensive financial services delivered in such a way that their clients observe and understand-well that their best interests are always being served by their Trusted Advisor will emerge from these debates with commanding authority within their communities.  They are the type of conflict-free financial advisors these debates always endorse.

 

Also in the article, hear how a fearless financial advisor responded to these newly proposed regulations,

  • ...If you look at the broad intent, the Labor Department is effectively recognizing a fiduciary standard and that only non-conflicted advice is in the best interests of (investors), as opposed to a less rigorous 'suitability' standard, which is a ... potentially biased or conflict-of-interest ridden standard.

 

Regardless of what happens with new regulatory rules, ensure you are "light years" ahead of a financial services industry, which is in many ways "in denial," by renewing your commitment to continue down the path of delivering conflict-free comprehensive financial services to your clients.  Dedicate the remainder of your career as a financial advisor to this goal and you will be among the financial advisors these debates are continually advocating to your potential clients.

 

Describe how fully committed you are
by posting your comment below...

 

 

Document Actions

Re: Does Compensation Skew Advice?

Avatar Posted by Graham Day at Aug 10, 2010 09:34 PM
Mark - in the UK, our regulator's research showed that product providers could easily influence the volume of business it received by increasing commission terms on single premium business. This called into question the impartiality of so called "Independent" Financial Advisers. As a result we are currently facing the biggest change in memory to our industry; "The Retail Distribution Review". In 2012 commission will no longer be allowed on investment products. Instead advisers will have to agree how much they are going to charge for investment advice prior to selecting a provider, and then either invoice the client separately or ask the product provider to deduct the appropriate fee off the top of the investment amount. "Factoring" high level's of commission through increased product charges will no longer be allowed. In addition, all advisers need to be professionally qualified to a higher level than currently.

The outcome is that 12 months ago I set about building a Fully Comprehensive proposition which clients value and are prepared to pay fees for, completely separate from any fees I may receive for arranging financial products for them. Thank you for your (and Bill Bachrach's) guidance in this respect.

The only problem is - not enough advisers in the UK know about your proposition - but they really need it!!

KR Graham Day - Honister Partners (UK)

March 2nd Dow Jones Article

Avatar Posted by Dominique Vercaemert at Mar 11, 2011 10:43 PM
Not only will I commit the rest of my career as a financial advisor to this goal but I am doing it already. Furthermore, I plan on becoming involved with respect to changing the industry in the future.

Compensation skewing advice

Avatar Posted by Peter Horsfield at Mar 11, 2011 10:43 PM
If you really want to see finacial regulation at work come to Australia!


Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting.

Info
Note: you are not logged in. You may optionally enter your username and password below. If you don't enter your username and password below, this comment will be posted as the 'Anonymous User'.
(Required)
(Required)
Weekly Email Summary

I'll E-mail you a weekly overview so you can keep up with new tools and resources for your practice!

Name:
Email:
Weblog Authors

Mark Little

Mark Little

Mark Little

Mark Little

m778little

m778little

Mark Little

Mark Little
Mark McKenna Little Speaker, Author & Trusted Advisor. In 1999 I nearly left the financial services industry, forever. I had built a multi-six figure business but I was killing myself working 84 hours per week trying to serve waaay too many clients on a transaction basis. Rather than quitting I decided to try one last completely radical idea: I crafted an entirely different business model focused on delivering TRULY comprehensive financial services. And it worked! I reduced my workload to just 3 days per week while quadrupling my business to well over $1 Million per year of predictable recurring revenue.

Lorri Morin

Lorri Morin